Poetry · GCSE English Literature
Follower
GCSE Seamus Heaney revision: father’s farm skill, child admiration, role reversal in ageing, “will not go away,” and comparison with Walking Away or Before You Were Mine.
He was an expert at the plough — and the child who wanted to follow now walks ahead while the father stumbles behind, still there, still not gone.
The important bits
What you need to know
- 1
Heaney opens with mastery: father “an expert” at setting the wing, mapping furrows, steering horses — skill is love’s first language.
- 2
The child mimics: “stumbled,” “fell sometimes,” “I wanted to grow up and plough.” Admiration is physical, not sentimental.
- 3
Play memory softens: riding on his back, “dipping and rising to his plod.” The father is landscape and ride.
- 4
Turn in the final stanza: roles reverse — father now stumbles behind the grown speaker, “will not go away.”
- 5
Guilt and care collide: the follower became leader; ageing is awkward for both.
- 6
Agricultural lexis — furrow, wing, hob-nailed, shaft — grounds love in labour, like Follower’s cluster-mates who use work spaces.
- 7
Half-rhyme and enjambment give conversational flow with slight unease — form mirrors unstable footing.
- 8
Pair with Walking Away for parental release, Before You Were Mine for child’s gaze on parent, Mother Any Distance for measuring departure.
Quotations worth analysing
Short evidence. Real method.
“An expert. He would set the wing / And fit the bright steel-pointed sock.”
Short declarative — expert — then tools named with care. Love begins as competence watched closely.
“I was a nuisance, tripping, falling, / Yapping always.”
Honest self-portrait — admiration mixed with irritation. The father’s patience is implied by what the child was.
“It is my father who keeps stumbling / Behind me, and will not go away.”
Present tense shift — now. Stumbling was once the child’s; now the father. “Will not go away” is love as haunting responsibility.
Go deeper
Admiration then reversal
Structure is the essay: first half praise, last stanza guilt. Do not flatten into “Heaney loves his dad.” Track the turn. Compare Walking Away: Day-Lewis lets the child go at the gate; Heaney’s father follows, stumbling. One releases; one cannot leave. Thesis: both explore parent-child distance, but Day-Lewis moralises letting go while Heaney shows ageing reversing who leads.
Go deeper
Farm as love language
Tools and animals are how this family speaks affection. Context: rural Northern Ireland, Heaney’s father — one clause. Pair with Singh Song! for work-as-love-stage (shop vs field). Methods: agricultural diction versus phonetic song.
Go deeper
Present tense ending
“Will not go away” traps the speaker in ongoing duty. Manhunt’s wife searches a body; Heaney’s speaker is followed by need. Different bonds — romantic repair vs filial guilt — but both use present-tense pressure.
See the idea in action
Question: Compare how poets present parents in Follower and one other poem. Opening: Both Heaney and Day-Lewis write parental bonds through separation, but Heaney’s ending traps the father behind a grown son while Day-Lewis blesses the child’s walk away. Evidence: “stumbling / Behind me” versus “love / Is proved in the letting go”; expert plough versus satellite drifting. Judgement: Heaney’s love is guilt-laden presence; Day-Lewis’s is proud release.
Exam technique
Turn knowledge into marks
Spend equal ink on the expert opening and the stumbling close — the poem is the pivot between them.
Common mistakes
Do not give these marks away
- 01
Only praising the father’s skill and skipping the reversal.
- 02
Confusing with Walking Away by Day-Lewis.
- 03
Calling the ending cruel without noting care in “will not go away.”
What changes in the final stanza of Follower?
AThe father becomes a plough expert
BThe roles reverse: the father now stumbles behind the grown speaker
CThe child dies
DThey leave the farm forever
Show the answer
The roles reverse: the father now stumbles behind the grown speaker. The follower became the leader; ageing performs the swap.
Quick questions
If this is the bit you searched
Is the father dead?
The poem ends with him still there, stumbling — analyse present-tense haunting, not funeral.
Best pairs?
Walking Away, Before You Were Mine, Mother Any Distance.
Why “expert”?
Child’s worshipful gaze — skill equals authority in the first half.
Tone at the end?
Tender guilt — responsibility, not hatred.